CCH (cch.taxgroup.com) reports:
James R. Eads, Jr., has been named the new Executive Director of the Federation of Tax Administrators (FTA). He is formerly the Public Affairs Director for Ryan, a state tax consulting firm. Eads' previous experience includes service as Chief Counsel for the Arkansas Department of Finance & Administration Revenue Division and as state tax counsel for Sears and AT&T Corp. He also worked for Ernst & Young and the Internal Revenue Service.
Eads replaces Harley Duncan, who resigned after 20 years with the FTA to take a position with KPMG. Eads will assume his new post on September 8.
News Release, Federation of Tax Administrators, August 14, 2008.
CCH (cch.taxgroup.com) reports:
The IRS's proposed overhaul of Code Sec. 6694 regulations (NPRM REG-129243-07, I.R.B. 2008-27, 32; TAXDAY, 2008/06/17, I.1) drew a subdued response from tax professionals at an August 18 hearing in Washington, D.C. Representatives from practitioner groups and the return-preparation industry appear ready to live with the regulations if they are finalized as proposed. Recommended changes are largely limited to clarifications of proposed rules, such as those dealing with reliance on a taxpayer's legal conclusions, disclosure, a preparer's reliance on the advice of others, penalties and the treatment of appraisers.
New Standard
The IRS issued the proposed regulations in June in response to changes made to Code Sec. 6694 by Congress in 2007. The Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (P.L. 110-28) replaced the realistic-possibility-of-success standard in Code Sec. 6694(a) with the heightened more-likely-than-not standard for undisclosed, nonabusive positions. The preparer must have a reasonable belief that the tax treatment of the position would more likely than not be sustained on its merits. Additionally, Congress extended Code Sec. 6694 to cover preparers of all returns, not just preparers of income tax returns.
Preparers also risk significantly increased penalties under the 2007 Small Business Act. The old, first-tier $250 penalty in Code Sec. 6694(a) has jumped to the greater of $1,000 or 50 percent of the income derived, or to be derived, by the preparer. The penalty for willful or reckless conduct in Code Sec. 6694(b) increased from $1,000 to the greater of $5,000 or 50 percent of the income derived or to be derived by the preparer.
Legal Conclusions
Under the proposed regulations, a preparer may generally rely in good faith on information provided by the taxpayer. However, the proposed regulations expressly prohibit the preparer from relying on information from a taxpayer with respect to legal conclusions on federal tax issues.
J. Edward Swails, speaking on behalf of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), warned that the prohibition could be interpreted as "changing the government's long-standing position that preparers can rely on taxpayer information regarding items that involve mixed issues of fact and law." These include, Swails explained, earnings and profits, depreciation and inventory. Swails also predicted that the prohibition would require preparers to "re-perform the research and analysis conducted by in-house tax professionals."
Brian Donahue, director of government relations for H&R Block, Inc., urged the IRS to clarify the definition of legal conclusion. For example, if a client believes that he or she owns a property outright but actually has a life estate in the property, would the taxpayer's representation of an ownership interest be a legal conclusion, Donahue asked.
Alternative Reference Sources
The first-tier penalty in Code Sec. 6694(a) would not be imposed if the IRS determines that the understatement was due to reasonable cause and the preparer acted in good faith. Among the factors the IRS will consider is the preparer's good-faith reliance on the advice of the taxpayer or others.
The Pennsylvania Society of Public Accountants (PSPA) asked the IRS to expand the factors and accept alternative reference sources in addition to the authorities in Reg. §1.662-4(d)(3)(iii). "The alternative reference sources would be for purposes of sustaining that a preparer has reasonable cause and acted in good faith," said Paul J. Cannataro, speaking on behalf of the PSPA. An example of an alternative reference source would be CCH's Master Tax Guide, Cannataro told CCH.
"The pressure from taxpayers to complete returns causes practitioners to work as many as 80 to 90 hours a week," Cannataro said. "For less complicated issues, the alternative reference sources provide a more expedient solution to the overwhelmed practitioner's problems."
Disclosure
The proposed regulations permit a preparer to contemporaneously document in his or her file that disclosure was made to the client. However, boilerplate language is not allowed. The IRS has estimated that preparers will be able to prepare the contemporaneous document in 15 minutes. "The 15-minute estimate is inaccurate and misleading," Cannataro said.
NATP Comments
The National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP), which did not send a representative to testify in person at the hearing, provided written comments to the IRS. The NATP urged the IRS to exercise caution in penalizing preparers for nonwillful errors. "IRS auditors should be disabused from raising a penalty as a result of a material error unless it is willful and there is a repeated pattern of it happening with the preparer. A one-time penalty should not be the basis for application of a penalty."
Appraisers cautioned that the proposed regulations could be interpreted as treating appraisers as nonsigning preparers. The proposed regulations govern both signing and nonsigning preparers.
Anita C. Soucy, attorney-advisor, Treasury Office of Tax Legislative Counsel, asked if a person could be retained to appraise a property and also prepare a return (related to the property). Jay Fisherman, speaking on behalf of the American Society of Appraisers, responded that this scenario would create a conflict of interest for the appraiser.
Deborah Butler, associate chief counsel (Procedure & Administration), indicated that the proposed regulations will be finalized before the end of the year. The AICPA recommended that final Code Sec. 6694 regulations give preparers some transition relief. "The effective date should include a transition rule allowing preparers to comply with the requirements of Notice 2008-13 (TAXDAY, 2008/01/02, I.1), rather than the final regulations, for any return filed or any advice given within the 60 days following publication of the final regulations."
In July, AICPA President Barry C. Melancon told CCH that equalizing the preparer and taxpayer penalty standards at substantial authority for undisclosed nonabusive return positions is the organization's top legislative priority (TAXDAY, 2008/07/24, M.2). The pending Renewable Energy and Job Creation Bill of 2008 (HR 6049), the so-called "extenders bill," would equalize the standards. While the bill passed in the House, it stalled in the Senate before Congress's August recess.
The PSPA urged the IRS to support equalizing the preparer and taxpayer standards at substantial authority at the hearing. "The IRS has the obligation to make Congress aware of laws that cause inefficiency in the tax system. One such example is the unequal standard placed on preparers versus taxpayers," Cannataro said.
By George L. Yaksick, Jr., CCH News Staff
AICPA Comments on Proposed Rules (REG-129243-07) Regarding Tax Return Preparer Penalties
National Association of Tax Professionals Comments on Tax Return Preparer Penalties Under Code Secs. 6694 and 6695
CCH (cch.taxgroup.com) reports:
The IRS has issued a new revenue procedure that taxpayers must follow when they wish to obtain automatic consent to change accounting methods. The new procedure generally applies to applications to change accounting methods that are filed on or after August 18, 2008, for a year of change ending on or after December 31, 2007.
In general, a change in accounting method occurs when there is a change in the overall plan of accounting for gross income or deductions or when there is a change in the treatment of any material item. Except as otherwise provided, a taxpayer must obtain the consent of the IRS before changing accounting methods for tax purposes. Under the general rule, a taxpayer obtains IRS consent to an accounting method change by filing Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, during the tax year in which the taxpayer wants to make the proposed change.
Previously, in Rev. Proc. 2002-9, 2002-1 CB 327, the IRS provided guidance on how taxpayers could receive automatic consent for certain accounting method changes specified in that revenue procedure. This latest guidance from the IRS supersedes Rev. Proc. 2002-9 and updates the automatic consent procedures for accounting method changes by clarifying some of the terms and conditions of Rev. Proc. 2002-9 and incorporating many of the modifications that have been made to that procedure since it was released.
General procedures. Taxpayers who fall within the scope of the new procedure are automatically granted the consent of the IRS to change an accounting method described in the Appendix of the procedure. In most situations, a completed and filed current Form 3115 will serve as the application for consent to change accounting methods. The taxpayer must include the designated automatic accounting method change number, as identified in the Appendix of the procedure, on the application. A user fee does not have to be paid with the application.
Taxpayers under IRS examination can file an application to change accounting methods under the automatic consent procedure, but only during certain time periods or under certain conditions. Taxpayers before an IRS Appeals Office or before a federal court can also file an application to change accounting methods under the automatic consent procedure but may receive limited audit protection if the accounting method to be changed is an issue under consideration.
Five-year change prohibition. In general, a five-year prohibition on accounting method changes under the automatic consent procedure applies. Thus, unless otherwise provided, a taxpayer that changed its overall method of accounting or applied for consent to change its overall method of accounting during any of the five tax years ending with the year of change may not obtain automatic consent to change its overall method of accounting under the new procedure. A similar restriction applies to a change in a method of accounting for a specific item.
Code Sec. 481 adjustment period. Many accounting method changes require a Code Sec. 481 adjustment so that amounts are not duplicated or omitted following the change. Unless otherwise provided, the new procedure sets forth a Code Sec. 481 adjustment period of four tax years for net positive Code Sec. 481 adjustments and one tax year for net negative Code Sec. 481 adjustments. Taxpayers may elect to use a one-year Code Sec. 481 adjustment period for positive net Code Sec. 481 adjustments that are less than $25,000. Special rules apply for taxpayers that are ceasing to engage in a trade or business or are terminating their existence.
Incorporation of additional accounting method changes. Additional accounting method changes that have been incorporated in the new automatic consent procedure include: (1) changes for lessor improvements abandoned at termination of the lease; (2) changes for accounting for, or identifying disposed, depreciable repairable and reusable spare parts; (3) changes from depreciating land or nondepreciable land improvements to not depreciating them; (4) changes to capitalize and depreciate repairable and reusable spare parts; (5) changes from the cash method to the accrual method for specific items; (6) changes to the overall cash method for specified transportation industry taxpayers; (7) changes to an overall cash/hybrid method for certain banks; (8) changes to an overall cash method for farmers; (9) changes for nonshareholder contributions to capital under Code Sec. 118; (10) changes for retainages under Code Sec. 451; (11) changes relating to timing of incurring liabilities for employee bonuses and vacation pay under Code Sec. 461; (12) changes for rebates and allowances under Code Sec. 461; (13) changes from a ratable inclusion of rental income or expense to inclusion in accordance with the rent allocation; (14) changes from permissible methods of identifying and valuing inventories; (15) changes in the official used vehicle guide utilized in valuing used vehicles; (16) changes relating to invoiced advertising association costs for new vehicle retail dealerships; (17) changes to dollar-value pools of manufacturers; and (18) changes to comply with Reg. §1.1012-1(c)(1)-(4).
Transition rules. The new automatic consent procedure generally applies to applications to change accounting methods that are filed on or after August 18, 2008, for a year of change ending on or after December 31, 2007. However, if a taxpayer within the scope of Rev. Proc. 97-27, 1997-1 CB 680, timely filed a Form 3115 under that procedure before August 18, 2008, requesting consent for a change in accounting method described in that procedure for a year of change ending on or after December 31, 2007, and the Form 3115 is still pending with the IRS National Office on August 18, 2008, the taxpayer may choose to make the change under the new procedure. The taxpayer must notify the IRS National Office of its intent to make the change under the new procedure before the later of September 18, 2008, or the issuance of a letter ruling granting or denying consent for the change.
If a taxpayer filed an application under Rev. Proc. 2002-9 with the IRS National Office to make a change in accounting method and the application was postmarked or received before August 18, 2008, the taxpayer makes the change under Rev. Proc. 2002-9. However, a taxpayer that filed an application under Rev. Proc. 2002-9 before August 18, 2008, for a year of change that is the taxpayer's first tax year ending on or after December 31, 2007, may choose to file an amended application for that year under the new procedure.
Rev. Proc. 2008-52, 2008FED ¶46,545
Other References:
Code Sec. 77
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶530
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶6304.20
Code Sec. 162
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8526.024
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8610.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8610.143
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8630.025
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8630.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8630.1242
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8630.45
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8754.1695
Code Sec. 163
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶9104.0442
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶9104.62
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶9303.0668
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶9303.10
Code Sec. 166
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶10,690.155
Code Sec. 167
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,009.046
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,009.135
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,037.675
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.015
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.021
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.283
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.285
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.288
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.40
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,043.45
Code Sec. 168
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.051
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.0516
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.0545
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.058
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.073
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.18
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.19
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.55
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.68
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,279.70
Code Sec. 171
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,855.073
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶11,855.65
Code Sec. 174
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.035
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.037
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.046
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.057
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.10
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,047.115
Code Sec. 179B
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,136.20
Code Sec. 194
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,335.073
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,335.25
Code Sec. 197
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,455.30
Code Sec. 199
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,476.0235
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,476.0334
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,476.0386
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,476.0387
Code Sec. 263
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.017
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.03
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.033
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.035
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.037
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.105
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.385
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.469
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,709.564
Code Sec. 263A
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,815.037
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,815.044
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,815.24
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,815.63
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,822.05
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,822.30
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,822.80
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,848.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,848.04
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,848.045
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,848.10
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,848.15
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,850.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,850.28
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶13,850.50
Code Sec. 280F
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶15,108.042
Code Sec. 404
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶18,352.18
Code Sec. 446
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.0257
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.026
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.0274
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.0312
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.0314
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.054
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.055
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.075
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.076
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.102
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.111
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.143
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.144
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.166
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.20
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.217
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.222
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.226
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.236
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.238
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.239
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.241
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.2412
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.242
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.243
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.2432
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.247
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.248
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.249
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.2505
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.2507
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.251
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.258
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.259
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.284
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.285
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.286
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.292
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.304
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.311
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.323
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.3235
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.625
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.627
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.6275
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.6305
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,620.641
Code Sec. 448
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,803.03
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,803.032
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,803.50
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶20,803.75
Code Sec. 451
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.7035
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.7043
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.9327
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.933
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,005.946
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,030.073
Code Sec. 454
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,503.075
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,503.35
Code Sec. 455
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,517.075
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,517.35
Code Sec. 461
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.0285
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.029
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.128
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.163
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.2345
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.235
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.2377
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.287
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.3215
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,817.704
Code Sec. 467
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶21,911.01
Code Sec. 471
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,206.021
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,206.5075
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,208.50
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,208.76
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,210.24
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,218.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,218.35
Code Sec. 472
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.03
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.037
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.04
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.041
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.047
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.25
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.33
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.55
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,240.70
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,241.04
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,241.45
Code Sec. 475
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,268.023
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,268.20
Code Sec. 481
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.029
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.38
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.40
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.493
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.498
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.50
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.502
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.51
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.58
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.595
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶22,277.70
Code Sec. 585
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶23,662.10
Code Sec. 811
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶25,900.20
Code Sec. 832
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶26,157.021
Code Sec. 846
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶26,331.105
Code Sec. 860D
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶26,662.65
Code Sec. 861
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶27,131.128
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶27,146.49
Code Sec. 904
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶27,901.82
Code Sec. 985
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶28,848.028
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶28,848.032
Code Sec. 986
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶28,861.25
Code Sec. 1273
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,283.45
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,283.50
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,283.60
Code Sec. 1276
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,361.40
Code Sec. 1281
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,421.04
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶31,421.35
Code Sec. 1363
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,062.035
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,062.20
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,062.40
Code Sec. 1400J
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,472.10
Code Sec. 1400L
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,477.026
Code Sec. 1400N
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶32,487.031
Code Sec. 7121
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶41,090.115
Statement of Procedural Rules 601.201
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶43,360.16
Statement of Procedural Rules 601.204
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶43,384.031
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶43,384.10
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶43,384.45
Tax Research Consultant
CCH Reference - TRC DEPR: 15,304
CCH Reference - TRC ACCTNG: 21,100
CCH Reference - TRC ACCTNG: 21,200
CCH (cch.taxgroup.com) reports:
The IRS has provided guidance regarding when a child of divorced or separated parents will be treated as a dependent of both parents. Under Code Sec. 152(e), a child of divorced or separated parents will only be treated as a dependent of the noncustodial parent for purposes of the dependency exemption only if the custodial parent provides a written declaration that he or she will not claim the child as a dependent for the tax year and the noncustodial parent attaches the declaration to his or her return. Many other provisions that provide for benefits and exclusions attributable to the dependents of a taxpayer reference the rules of Code Sec. 152, including its use in relation to the children of divorced or separated parents. However, under this procedure, the IRS will treat the child as a dependent of both parents for purposes of several provisions relating to medical expenses, medical coverage and employee benefits, regardless of whether or not the custodial parent released the claim of the exemption.
Specifically, the IRS will treat a child as a dependent of both parents, without a declaration of the custodial parent, under the following circumstances:
--the exclusion from gross income of certain employer reimbursements of expenses incurred for the medical care of the employee's child under Code Sec. 105(b);
--the exclusion from gross income of employer contributions to an accident or health plan on behalf of the employee's children under Code Sec. 106(a) and Reg. §1.106-1;
--the exclusion from gross income of fringe benefits qualifying as no-additional-cost services or qualified employee discounts under Code Sec. 132(a) that are treated as used by the employee due to use by an employee's child under Code Sec. 132(h)(2);
--the deduction of medical expenses of the taxpayer's child under Code Sec. 213(a); and
--the exclusions under Code Secs. 220(f)(1) and 223(f)(1) for distributions from Archer Medical Savings Accounts and Health Savings Accounts, respectively, if the distributions are used to pay qualified medical expenses of the account beneficiary's child.
The guidance is effective August 18, 2008, but taxpayers may choose to apply the guidance to any tax year beginning after December 31, 2004, for which a credit or refund can still be claimed under Code Sec. 6511.
Rev. Proc. 2008-48, 2008FED ¶46,544
Other References:
Code Sec. 105
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶6702.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶6702.23
Code Sec. 106
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶6803.01
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶6803.193
Code Sec. 132
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶7438.034
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶7438.14
Code Sec. 152
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8250.027
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶8250.21
Code Sec. 213
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,543.057
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,543.20
Code Sec. 220
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,675.25
Code Sec. 223
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,785.041
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶12,785.25
Tax Research Consultant
CCH Reference - TRC INDIV: 42,356.05
CCH Reference - TRC INDIV: 42,450
CCH Reference - TRC INDIV: 42,500
CCH Reference - TRC FILEIND: 6,168.20
CCH Reference - TRC COMPEN: 33,052
CCH Reference - TRC COMPEN: 45,056.05
CCH Reference - TRC COMPEN: 45,154.05
CCH (cch.taxgroup.com) reports:
The IRS has released the Summer 2008 issue of the Statistics of Income (SOI) Bulletin. The SOI is a quarterly compilation of information from federal tax returns and other documents. This issue of the bulletin contains data on the growth in profits and tax liability reported by foreign-controlled domestic corporations.
According to 2005 data, there were 61,820 foreign-controlled domestic corporations (FCDCs), accounting for 1.1 percent of the total of all U.S. corporations. However, FCDCs generated $3.5 trillion of total receipts with $9.2 trillion of total assets, accounting for 13.7 percent of receipts and 13.9 percent of assets reported on all U.S. corporation income tax returns. Profits, or net income less deficit, reported by FCDCs for tax purposes were $165.2 billion, an 81.9 percent increase from $90.8 billion reported in 2004. The U.S. tax liability for FCDCs, total income tax after credits, was $42.4 billion for 2005, a 41.7 percent increase since 2004.
The bulletin also includes articles on:
--Foreign corporations controlled by U.S. multinational corporations;
--Corporations that claimed the foreign tax credit on their U.S. tax returns;
--Growth trends in the number of partnership and sole proprietorship returns;
--Federal gift tax returns filed for gifts given in 2005; and
--Use of business credit for research activities.
The Statistics of Income Bulletin is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15250-7954, Both annual subscriptions and single issues are available. The Bulletin is also available online at www.irs.gov.
IR-2008-97,
2008FED ¶46,543
Summer 2008 SOI Bulletin [Document will be available on August 20, 2008 - CCH.]
Other References:
Code Sec. 6108
CCH Reference - ¶36,942.01
CCH Reference - ¶36,942.40
Tax Research Consultant
CCH Reference - TRC IRS: 3,152.10
Daily Tax News
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |